Peec AI Alternatives (November 2026): 10 Tools With Prices Checked
The best Peec AI alternatives are Otterly.AI if you want a cheaper self-serve tracker, Profound if you need enterprise depth, and Semrush or Ahrefs if you already pay for one of those suites. If what you really want is a one-time answer to "is AI recommending us, and who does it recommend instead?", you may not need a monthly tracker at all.
Peec AI is a good tool. People look for alternatives because the cost climbs with every prompt and engine, and many teams don't yet know whether they have a problem worth tracking daily. This page covers what Peec costs today, the alternatives with prices checked against each vendor's own pricing page, and a quick test for whether you need a subscription.
We sell a tool in this category too. LumenGEO is on the list, it is clearly marked, and it is not ranked first.
Reviewed & pricing current as of November 2026
Pick by the job. Tracking every day across markets: Peec AI or Otterly.AI. Enterprise scale and specialist support: Profound. Already paying for Semrush or Ahrefs: use their AI module first. One answer before you commit: a one-time multi-engine check, then subscribe only if the answer says you have a problem.
What does Peec AI cost in November 2026?
Peec AI starts at $95 a month. The Starter plan tracks 50 prompts daily on 3 AI models you choose, in 1 country and 1 project. Pro is $245 a month (150 prompts, 2 projects, 3 countries), Advanced is $495 (350 prompts, 5 projects) and Enterprise is custom. Annual billing takes 15% off.
Two details matter when you compare. First, the self-serve plans let you pick 3 models from ChatGPT, Google AI Mode, AI Overviews, Microsoft Copilot, Gemini and Naver; Perplexity is an extra-cost add-on. Second, cost scales with prompts, so a team that wants 150 prompts across more engines is quickly looking at the Pro tier or above.
What do the AI engines themselves recommend?
When we asked ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Claude the same five buyer questions about AI visibility tools on 8 November 2026, Peec AI was named in 10 of the 20 answers. Semrush and Ahrefs were named in 12, Otterly.AI in 11 and Profound in 8. LumenGEO was named in none, which is part of why we publish pages like this one.
| Tool | Named in (of 20 answers) |
|---|---|
| Semrush | 12 |
| Ahrefs | 12 |
| Otterly.AI | 11 |
| Peec AI | 10 |
| Profound | 8 |
| LumenGEO | 0 |
Method: 5 buyer questions (for example "What's the best AI visibility checker for small businesses?" and "How do I find out which competitors ChatGPT recommends instead of me?"), each asked once on each engine through DataForSEO's LLM API with web search on (GPT-5.4 mini, Perplexity Sonar, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Claude Sonnet 5.5). A tool counts as named if the answer mentions it by name. One run is a snapshot, not a ranking: answers change from run to run.
The more useful finding is who wrote the pages behind those answers. The 20 answers cited 135 pages, none of them ours. Of the 54 we opened and classified, 38 were published by software companies (Semrush, Ahrefs, Surfer, Zapier and a long list of AI-visibility vendors), 9 by independent publishers, 6 were developer posts on dev.to and 1 was a directory. Of the "best tools" lists the engines cited, most came from a vendor with a tool on the list. This page has the same conflict, which is why ours is not at the top.
The tools that AI engines recommend most are the ones named on the most lists, most of them written by vendors, not necessarily the best fit for you. Use the table below to shortlist on price and job, then test two of them on your own brand.
The best Peec AI alternatives, compared
These are the strongest alternatives, roughly ordered by entry price and fit. Every price was checked on the vendor's own pricing page on 8 November 2026.
Otterly.AI
Best for: the same daily tracking job at a lower entry price.
Price: Lite $29 a month (15 prompts), Standard $189 (100 prompts), Premium $489 (400 prompts); about 15% less on annual billing. Free trial.
Engines: ChatGPT, Google AI Overviews, Perplexity and Microsoft Copilot on every plan; Gemini, AI Mode and Claude are paid add-ons.
Versus Peec: Lite has fewer prompts than Peec Starter; Standard ($189, 100 prompts) costs about the same per prompt as Peec, with 4 engines including Perplexity.
Rankscale
Best for: the lowest entry price with broad engine coverage.
Price: Essentials is listed at $17 a month on yearly billing only, for 120 credits a month; Pro is $99 a month. 7-day trial of Pro.
Engines: 17 or more on every plan, including ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude and Copilot.
Versus Peec: far cheaper and more engines; the entry plan's credits run out quickly on a long prompt list.
HubSpot AEO
Best for: teams already on HubSpot who want AI visibility next to their CRM.
Price: $50 a month ($45 on annual billing) for 25 prompts. Free trial of 25 prompts with no credit card. The separate AI Search Grader is free.
Engines: ChatGPT, Perplexity and Gemini.
Versus Peec: half the prompts and the same number of engines (fixed, not your choice), at about half Peec's entry price.
Semrush AI Visibility Toolkit
Best for: teams whose SEO already runs on Semrush.
Price: $99 a month per domain for 25 daily prompts. Semrush's SEO + AI Search plans also include AI tracking, from $139 a month (50 prompts).
Engines: ChatGPT, Google AI, Gemini and Perplexity.
Versus Peec: fewer prompts per dollar on its own, but cheap if you already pay for Semrush.
Ahrefs Brand Radar
Best for: existing Ahrefs customers.
Price: a small daily prompt allowance is included in paid Ahrefs plans (5 prompts a day on Lite). Custom prompt tracking starts at $50 a month and the AI Visibility Index at $199 a month, on top of an Ahrefs subscription.
Engines: AI Overviews, AI Mode, ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Copilot, with Claude on custom prompts.
Versus Peec: only good value if you already pay for Ahrefs.
Writesonic GEO
Best for: teams that want tracking and an AI writing tool in one subscription.
Price: Starter $99 a month ($79 on annual billing) for 50 prompts; Basic $249 (100 prompts). Free trial.
Engines: ChatGPT, Gemini and Google AI Overviews on Starter.
Versus Peec: same prompt and engine count at entry ($99 vs $95), with fixed engines, plus a writing tool you may not need.
Scrunch
Best for: mid-market teams that want more prompts and site audits in one plan.
Price: Core $250 a month for 125 prompts and 5 site audits; Enterprise is custom. 7-day free trial.
Engines: ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews and Copilot on Core; up to 9 on Enterprise.
Versus Peec: more prompts than Peec Starter for about 2.6 times the price, with site audits included.
AthenaHQ
Best for: teams that want unlimited prompts and 11 engines on one self-serve plan.
Price: Starter $295 a month for 3,600 credits (one credit is one AI answer), with unlimited prompts; Enterprise is custom. A free tier gives a one-off batch of credits.
Engines: 11, including ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Overviews, AI Mode, Gemini, Claude and Copilot.
Versus Peec: many more engines and no prompt cap, at about three times Peec's entry price.
Profound
Best for: large brands that want enterprise scale, many markets and hands-on support.
Price: no public paid plan for brands. There is a free 7-day trial (50 prompts a day on ChatGPT, Gemini and AI Overviews), then Enterprise at a custom price after a demo.
Engines: up to 9 on Enterprise.
Versus Peec: more depth and support, no published price. A step up, not a cheaper option.
LumenGEO (ours)
Best for: finding out where you stand before you pay for any tracker.
Price: free check on ChatGPT and Perplexity; a one-time $19 AI Visibility Report (20 buyer answers across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Claude, the lists they cite and your fixes written out); weekly tracking from $49 a month for 10 keywords.
Engines: 4 in the report; ChatGPT and Perplexity on the $49 plan.
Versus Peec: not a daily tracker. It answers "are we recommended, and by whom instead?" once, across four engines, so you can decide whether a tracker is worth paying for.
Peec AI alternatives at a glance (prices checked November 2026)
| Tool | Entry price | At that price |
|---|---|---|
| Peec AI | $95/mo | 50 prompts, 3 engines |
| Otterly.AI | $29/mo | 15 prompts, 4 engines |
| Rankscale | $17/mo (yearly only) | 120 credits, 17+ engines |
| HubSpot AEO | $50/mo | 25 prompts, 3 engines |
| Semrush AI Visibility | $99/mo | 25 prompts, 4 engines |
| Ahrefs Brand Radar | From $50/mo + Ahrefs plan | Custom prompts |
| Writesonic GEO | $99/mo ($79 annual) | 50 prompts, 3 engines |
| Scrunch | $250/mo | 125 prompts, 4 engines |
| AthenaHQ | $295/mo | 3,600 answers, 11 engines |
| Profound | Custom (enterprise) | Up to 9 engines |
| LumenGEO (ours) | Free; $19 once; $49/mo tracking | 20 answers, 4 engines (report) |
Prices are each vendor's own published entry price on the date above, before tax. Vendors in this category change plans often; check the vendor's page before you buy.
Do you need a subscription at all?
You need a daily or weekly tracker if you will act on the changes it shows: you publish, pitch or fix something every week and want to see whether it moved. If you don't have that loop yet, a tracker mostly shows you a flat line at zero. The first question they need answered is a single one: does AI recommend us today, who does it recommend instead, and which pages is it reading?
That is a one-time check, and it should be wide rather than frequent. A small daily prompt set on a few engines tells you less about where you stand than five buyer questions asked once on each of four engines (20 answers).
What a one-time check should give you:
- Several engines, not one. ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Claude cite different sources. Being named on one says little about the others.
- Real buyer questions. "Best [category] for [type of customer]", "is [brand] legit", "alternatives to [competitor]", not just your brand name.
- The pages behind each answer. The lists and guides the engines quoted are the ones you can pitch, get onto or answer with a page of your own.
- Who is named instead of you, and how often.
This is what our report does: 20 buyer answers across ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Claude, the lists those answers cite that you can get onto, and the fixes written out. It costs $19 once and starts from a free check on ChatGPT and Perplexity. If the answer says you have a problem worth watching, that is the moment a tracker like Peec, Otterly or ours earns its monthly fee.
Find out if AI recommends you before you pay for tracking
FreeReal answer in 20 seconds
Frequently asked questions
What is the best Peec AI alternative?
It depends on the job. Otterly.AI is the closest self-serve alternative at a lower entry price ($29/mo). Profound is the enterprise alternative. Semrush's and Ahrefs' AI modules make sense if you already pay for that suite. If you only need a one-time answer, a single multi-engine check is cheaper than any monthly plan.
Is there a free Peec AI alternative?
Not a full one. The closest free options are free trials (Peec, Otterly, Profound, Scrunch and HubSpot AEO all offer one), HubSpot's free AI Search Grader for a quick high-level grade, and LumenGEO's free check, which shows whether ChatGPT and Perplexity name you for one buyer question and which sites they cite instead. A free check tells you where you stand today; only a paid tracker shows the trend.
Is Peec AI worth it?
Yes, if you will act on what it tracks every week and need multi-country coverage. If you are not yet sure AI search matters for your brand, run a one-time check first. Paying monthly to watch a number you are not ready to move is an easy way to overspend.
How is Peec AI different from Profound?
Peec AI is self-serve with published prices, starting at $95 a month, and is built for marketing teams and agencies. Profound is aimed at large brands, with a sales-led enterprise plan and specialist support. See our Profound alternatives page for that side of the market.
Related: Profound alternatives · Otterly.AI alternatives · HubSpot AI Search Grader alternatives · GEO tools 2026 buyer's guide · Best Perplexity SEO tracking tools · LumenGEO vs Otterly